Quality System Regulation (QSR)

The transition to the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR)

Introduction

For decades, medical device manufacturers selling into the U.S. market have relied on the Quality System Regulation (21 CFR Part 820) as the foundation for their quality management systems (QMS). Introduced in 1996, the QSR established the essential requirements manufacturers must meet to ensure that medical devices are safe, effective, and fit for their intended purpose.

However, as technology, global markets, and regulatory science have evolved, the QSR has remained essentially unchanged. In contrast, many other jurisdictions, most notably the European Union and Canada, have moved towards standards-based quality system frameworks, based on the ISO 13485:2016 standard.

Recognising the benefits of global harmonisation, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) have announced a plan to modernise 21 CFR 820. This plan will replace the existing QSR with the Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR), a regulation that aligns closely with ISO 13485:2016, with certain FDA-specific additions.

In this article, we explore the history and content of the QSR, what’s changing under the QMSR, and what manufacturers need to do to prepare for the transition.

The Quality System Regulation (QSR): A legacy framework

The Quality System Regulation (21 CFR Part 820) provides the regulatory requirements for manufacturers of finished medical devices intended for commercial distribution in the United States. The QSR requires that manufacturers establish and maintain a QMS covering design, manufacturing, packaging, labelling, storage, installation, and servicing.

Key components of the QSR include:

The QSR is enforced through FDA inspections, and compliance is mandatory for any manufacturer wishing to legally market a device in the U.S.

Why change now?

Although the Quality System Regulation (21 CFR Part 820) has served as a robust regulatory framework, there are several drivers for its update:

  • Global alignment: The current QSR is not formally harmonised with ISO 13485:2016, the internationally recognised standard for medical device quality systems. This lack of alignment means manufacturers with global operations often have to maintain two similar but distinct QMS frameworks. Harmonisation with ISO 13485 allows companies to maintain a more unified QMS, reducing complexity and administrative burden.
  • Efficiency for regulators and industry: Aligning the FDA’s QMS requirements with ISO 13485 allows both manufacturers and FDA inspectors to benefit from a unified approach, reducing duplication of effort.
  • Modernisation of requirements: The new regulation provides an opportunity to reflect current industry best practices and advances in manufacturing, technology, and risk management. The QMSR reflects current best practices in device design, manufacturing, and post-market monitoring, supporting innovation while ensuring safety. The integrated risk management approach supports improved product safety and performance over the total product life cycle.
  • Support for the FDA’s participation in the Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP): The MDSAP is based on ISO 13485:2016, and aligning U.S. regulations will strengthen the FDA’s role in this international audit model. Companies participating in the MDSAP program will benefit from greater alignment between the FDA and other regulatory audits.

The Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR): What’s changing?

The proposed Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR) will incorporate ISO 13485:2016 by reference as the foundation of U.S. device quality requirements. This means compliance with ISO 13485:2016, with certain FDA-specific additions, will be considered compliance with the QMSR.

Key features of the QMSR include:

  • ISO 13485 at its core: The FDA will incorporate ISO 13485:2016 into U.S. law, meaning manufacturers must adopt this standard’s risk-based approach to quality management, supplier controls, process validation, and post-market surveillance.
  • FDA-specific requirements: The QMSR will include additional requirements or clarifications to ensure alignment with U.S. law. Examples include:
    • Device labelling and packaging requirements specific to FDA expectations.
    • Complaint handling and reporting aligned with U.S. post-market surveillance systems (e.g., Medical Device Reporting, MDR).
    • U.S.-specific records retention periods.
  • Terminology adjustments: Some terms and definitions will be clarified to align with ISO 13485 and U.S. law, avoiding conflicts in interpretation.
  • Focus on risk management: The QMSR emphasises the integration of risk management throughout the product life cycle, consistent with ISO 13485’s requirements and the FDA’s total product life cycle (TPLC) approach.

FDA inspection and enforcement under the QMSR

The FDA’s inspection program will continue under the authority of 21 CFR Part 820 , but inspections will assess compliance with the QMSR (and therefore ISO 13485:2016). The FDA will provide updated inspection guidance to investigators to ensure consistency in applying the QMSR.

Importantly, the transition to QMSR does not mean an ISO 13485:2016 certificate from a notified body or registrar will automatically satisfy FDA requirements. Manufacturers will still need to demonstrate compliance through FDA inspections, which may examine how ISO 13485 processes are implemented consistent with U.S. legal and regulatory requirements.

Timeline for transition

As of mid-2025, the final QMSR rule is expected soon, with an effective date proposed 1 year after publication. The FDA has indicated that the transition period will provide manufacturers time to:

  • Assess gaps between their current QSR-based QMS and ISO 13485:2016.
  • Update procedures, records, and training.
  • Engage with suppliers to ensure their controls align with the updated expectations.

Manufacturers already certified to ISO 13485:2016 will generally be well-positioned for the change, though they will need to ensure they address the FDA-specific components of the QMSR.

What should manufacturers do to prepare?

While the long-term benefits are clear, the transition will require upfront effort to update systems, documentation, and training. Here are some practical steps medical device manufacturers should consider as the transition approaches:

  • Conduct a gap analysis: Evaluate your current QMS against ISO 13485:2016 and the proposed QMSR to identify differences. Pay particular attention to risk management, supplier controls, and post-market processes.
  • Update procedures and documentation: Revise your QMS procedures, work instructions, and records to close identified gaps. Ensure that U.S.-specific requirements are clearly integrated.
  • Training: Shifting from a QSR-focused system to a risk-based ISO 13485 framework may require significant retraining and mindset adjustments. Provide training on ISO 13485:2016 and the new QMSR requirements to quality, regulatory, manufacturing, and design teams.
  • Engage with suppliers: Assess your supplier controls to ensure they meet the risk-based requirements of ISO 13485 and the QMSR. Enhanced supplier controls may require new contracts, audits, and oversight activities.
  • Plan for inspection readiness: Update your internal audit program and management review processes to reflect the new requirements, and ensure you are ready for FDA inspections under the QMSR framework.

Conclusion

The FDA’s transition from the QSR to the QMSR represents a major milestone in modernising U.S. medical device regulation. By aligning with ISO 13485:2016, the FDA is helping manufacturers reduce duplication, streamline operations, and focus on what matters most: delivering safe, effective, and high-quality medical devices to patients.

Manufacturers that act early to understand and implement the new requirements will not only ensure compliance but will also position themselves for success in an increasingly globalised and competitive market.

Resources

International Standards:

United States of America (USA)

Food and Drug Administration (FDA), Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act (FD&C Act):

European Union (EU)

Medical Devices Regulation (MDR) 2017/745:

In Vitro Diagnostic Medical Devices Regulation (IVDR) 2017/746

Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP)

The Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP) is an international initiative that allows a single regulatory audit of a medical device manufacturer’s quality management system to satisfy the requirements of multiple participating countries.

Audit: A systematic, independent examination of a manufacturer’s processes, procedures, and products to ensure compliance with regulatory standards and quality requirements. Also see Internal Audit.

Corrective and Preventive Action (CAPA): Actions taken to eliminate the causes of existing nonconformities or other undesirable situations (corrective actions) and to prevent recurrence (preventive actions).

Design Control: A systematic process that ensures a device is designed to meet user needs and intended uses.

Intended purpose: The use for which a medical device is intended according to the information provided by the manufacturer on the labelling, in the instructions for use (IFU), or in promotional materials. This may also be referred to as the Intended Use in some jurisdictions. Also see Indication of Use.

ISO 13485: An international standard that specifies requirements for a quality management system (QMS) specific to the medical devices industry.

Labelling: The label on a medical device and all descriptive and informational literature associated with the device. Also see Instructions for Use (IFU)

Manufacturer: A legal entity that designs, produces, assembles, or labels a medical device with the intention of placing it on the market.

Medical Device Single Audit Program (MDSAP): A program that allows a single audit of a medical device manufacturer to satisfy the requirements of multiple regulatory authorities.

Post-Market Surveillance (PMS): The proactive collection and review of experiences and data related to a device after it has been released onto the market to ensure continued safety and performance.

Quality: The degree to which a device consistently meets regulatory requirements and user expectations for safety, efficacy, reliability, and performance.

Quality Assurance (QA): The systematic activities implemented to ensure that devices consistently meet regulatory requirements and standards while meeting user needs and expectations.

Quality Controls: The measures and tests conducted on the final product or at the end of the production process to ensure it meets all specified quality standards and regulatory requirements.

Quality Management System (QMS): A formalised system that documents the structure, responsibilities, and procedures required to achieve effective quality management.

Quality Management System Regulation (QMSR): The U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) regulation that aligns its medical device quality system requirements with ISO 13485:2016 to streamline global compliance and enhance device safety and effectiveness.

Quality System Management Review (QSMR): A structured, periodic evaluation conducted by top management to assess the effectiveness, suitability, and compliance of a medical device manufacturer’s quality management system, ensuring continuous improvement and alignment with regulatory requirements.

Quality System Regulation (QSR): Outlined in 21 CFR Part 820, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) framework requires medical device manufacturers to establish and maintain a quality management system to ensure their products consistently meet applicable requirements and specifications.

Regulation: The rules, laws, standards, and requirements set by regulatory authorities to ensure the safety, efficacy, and quality of devices intended for medical use.

Regulatory Authority: An official body overseeing and enforcing laws, regulations, and standards within a specific industry or sector to ensure compliance and protect public interests. Also known as a Regulatory Authority. Also see Competent Authority and Notified Body.

Risk Management (RM): The systematic application of management policies, procedures, and practices to the tasks of analysing, evaluating, controlling, and monitoring risk.

Standard: A document that provides guidance, requirements, or specifications established by regulatory bodies, industry organisations, or international consensus groups.

Supplier Management: Overseeing and controlling the relationships and activities with external suppliers to ensure the quality, reliability, and regulatory compliance of sourced materials and components.

Technical Documentation: All documents that demonstrate the design, manufacture, and performance of the device, essential for ensuring compliance with regulatory requirements. This is also known as the Technical File.

Total Product Lifecycle (TPLC): A U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) term referring to the entire process of a medical device’s development, from initial concept and design through premarket review, manufacturing, marketing, post-market surveillance, and eventual product retirement. It emphasises continuous evaluation of safety, effectiveness, and quality throughout the device’s lifespan.